Devops Vs Agile or Devops With Agile: The Better Approach

In the competitive estate of many workplaces where maximum productivity overrides any other factor, choosing between Agile and DevOps or the combination of both can often be confusing. The core of adopting either or both is to solve organizational problems and meet productivity needs, and since these problems are not static or responsive to ready-mades solutions, understanding both DevOps and Agile can give companies a wider range of options to tackle possible future problems.

Both Agile and DevOps aim to make better productivity and continuous development in software development. Constantly looking for the most appropriate ways to get things done putting some priorities at the center of processes.

In getting to conclude if Agile and DevOps should operate contrastingly or dependently, understanding these different methods is of high essence. Below is how Agile and DevOps work differently.


The Agile Approach

The crack in the waterfall approach brought about the need for the Agile Method. The waterfall was cumbersome and cared mostly about the end than the route to the end and the products over the production team and users. Agile introduced a more simplified approach that ensured users are adequately carried along with, so the software team is sure it is on the right path. The 1990s saw the advent of the Agile approach with the Scrum and Kanban approach gaining widespread acceptance.

By 2001, the Scum and Kanban theories have been codified by the Manifesto for Agile Software Development under the generic name, Agile Software Development which functioned under 4 themes:

  • Individuals and interaction over processes and tools
  • Working software over comprehensive documentation
  • Customer collaboration over contract negotiation
  • Responding to change over following a plan


The comprehensive approach of agile was to bring simplicity even as processes are made to be continuously productive.  It encourages the developer to break down processes into small pieces as user stories, aiming to understand productivity and success from the vantage of the end-users.

Through this method, the developer can have constant feedback with how well his software is doing and where there's a need for change as submitted by the users.  Agile further advocates for adaptive planning, early and continuous delivery, evolving development that enables the developer to produce software that grows better version after version all to the needs of the consumer.


DevOps Method

DevOps is a relatively new approach compared to Agile which has been around since the 90s. While Agile was a contradictory response to the Waterfall method, DevOps is not contrasting or form of response to Agile.

DevOps is a software development methodology that merges information technology with software development, so they work together through the complete process cycle from design through development and production support. One can become a DevOps professional by getting the best online DevOps training and Agile DevOps certification.

DevOps has become a widely accepted umbrella for technical practices like continuous integration, deployment, and delivery. High-level operation and cross-functional team. Same way as Agile is defined, there are 3 documented principles in DevOps

The Principle of Flow: Apply the metric of lead time which reduce the time from commit to code

The principle of feedback: Increase the feedback from production back to development embracing principles that include real-time monitoring and automation alerting.

The Principle of Continuous Learning and experimentation for evolving and consistent experimenting.

Develops come in basically when codes need to be written. It concerns itself with how the code is to be written, expected outcomes and possible problems through the process of providing proactive solutions and a framework that is open to large changes and experimentation.

Differences in Agile and DevOps

Both DevOps and Agile do not exist as contenders. The target different market players and even though they are interwoven, they are not the same. Agile cover product owners dealing in project management and strongly defined roles for the actualization of set objectives. Technicality is the centralized theme of DevOps. If focuses more on the engineers accepting shared responsibilities on the procedural routine that an operation should follow including the deployment of software that is required for management by product owners.

The first principle of DevOps focuses on getting code into source control and then into production. It makes no assumption about the process used to determine the customer's needs.

While on the other hand calls for fixed roles and responsibilities. The product owner is at the top of the chain in a matter of importance. He sets up the requirements and decides the product and procedure works for engineers.

Summarily, DevOps combines the responsibilities of engineers to define templates on which product owners operate their managerial roles. While agile positions the Agile master at the top of the chain cutting slack and defining processes for engineers. Another difference is that while Agile defines roles, DevOps shares responsibilities. The idea of defined roles is not entertained in DevOps as it is in Agile.

 Agile-DevOps is the new cool

At this point, the differences between agile and DevOps should be clear enough. Both ideas are relevant to production and are different in views and mode of application. Considering the benefits of both methods and how they complement one another, embracing both can be the key to better productivity and greater user experiences.

A critical look at both agile and DevOps shows that DevOps technically furthers the agile process. Both principles hope to achieve similar results only at different phases of production. Both favor fast iteration and quick reaction to changes in the production process. A blend of both is the way to go to be competitively relevant and to enjoy processes that are nearly hiccups free and further improves organizational productivity.